Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.29
Change-$0.03 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.37M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$63.66
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.85B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. NBNAX (247M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (0.88) vs NBNAX (0.80). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.51 vs. NBNAX (8.49). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 16.96 vs. RERFX (15.74).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.576 | 18.636 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.88 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.49 | 10.51 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.02 | 38.06 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.96 | 15.74 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.71 | 44.55 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement