Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.45
Change+$0.17 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$60.50
Change+$0.39 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.77B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. NBNAX (227M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (1.32) vs NBNAX (0.80). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. RERFX (6.67). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.14 vs. RERFX (20.94).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.582 | 12.747 | 154% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.32 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.97 | 6.67 | 224% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.22 | 28.25 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.14 | 20.94 | 144% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.96 | 27.18 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement