Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.27
Change-$0.13 (-0.84%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.92M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$65.36
Change-$0.35 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.4B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. NBNAX (251M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (0.85) vs NBNAX (0.80). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. NBNAX (9.51). NBNAX (15.71) and RERFX (15.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.195 | 21.804 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.85 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.51 | 10.59 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.57 | 50.89 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.71 | 15.31 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.28 | 45.03 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement