Ad is loading...
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$13.15
Change+$0.87 (+7.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.5M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$51.73
Change+$2.46 (+4.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a Hold and RERFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NBNAX (172M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (1.43) vs NBNAX (0.88). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (17 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.39 vs. RERFX (-14.90). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. RERFX (15.31).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.954 | -8.181 | 61% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.43 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.39 | -14.90 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.02 | -8.87 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.47 | 15.31 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.78 | 0.97 | 1,419% |