Ad is loading...
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$13.18
Change+$0.05 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.01M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$54.74
Change+$0.16 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.3B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. NBNAX (190M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (1.79) vs NBNAX (1.37). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (17 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. RERFX (34.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.48 vs. RERFX (4.24). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.82 vs. RERFX (1.65).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.012 | 2.013 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 127B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.79 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 4.24 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.10 | -8.01 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.82 | 1.65 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.68 | 22.10 | 143% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...