Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.22
Change-$0.09 (-0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.04M
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$62.22
Change-$0.33 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.64B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
Aug 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. NBNAX (248M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (0.92) vs NBNAX (0.81). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (18 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. RERFX (6.04). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.87 vs. RERFX (11.15).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.498 | 15.952 | 116% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 248M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.92 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | 6.04 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.10 | 31.28 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.87 | 11.15 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.27 | 39.22 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement