Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBNAX vs RERFX
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NBNAX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$14.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.6M
American Funds Europacific Growth R5
Price$59.61
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.29B
NBNAX vs RERFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBNAX vs. RERFX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBNAX is a Buy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. NBNAX (221M). RERFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: RERFX (1.39) vs NBNAX (0.84). NBNAX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NBNAX (17 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERFX (30.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: RERFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. RERFX (1.34). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.00 vs. RERFX (31.34).
| NBNAX | RERFX | NBNAX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.52 | 223% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 0.52 | 258% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.635 | 11.088 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 221M | 132B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.39 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 1.34 | 757% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.01 | 18.94 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.00 | 31.34 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.07 | 20.90 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement