Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs WCMLX
NBSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Instl
Price$55.59
Change+$0.87 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets531.25M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.95
Change+$0.21 (+1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
NBSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBSMX has more cash in the bank: 531M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). NBSMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBSMX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBSMX (1.13). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: WCMLX (100000) vs NBSMX (1000000). NBSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. WCMLX (4.73). NBSMX return over 5 years is better than : 14.72 vs. WCMLX (12.53).
| NBSMX | WCMLX | NBSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.79 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.550 | 6.843 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 43.7M | 1,215% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.10 | 4.73 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.06 | 34.97 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.72 | 12.53 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement