Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs WCMLX
NBSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs WCMLX
NBSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBSMX has more cash in the bank: 689M vs. WCMLX (53.2M). NBSMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBSMX (18 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBSMX (1.11). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: WCMLX (100000) vs NBSMX (1000000). NBSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.77 vs. WCMLX (25.43). NBSMX return over 5 years is better than : 9.19 vs. WCMLX (-2.67).
| NBSMX | WCMLX | NBSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.79 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.905 | 11.119 | 161% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 689M | 53.2M | 1,295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.77 | 25.43 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.61 | 29.91 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.19 | -2.67 | -344% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement