Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSMX vs WCMLX
NBSMX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NBSMX vs WCMLX
NBSMX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSMX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSMX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBSMX has more cash in the bank: 687M vs. WCMLX (53.4M). NBSMX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NBSMX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NBSMX (18 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NBSMX (1.11). NBSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSMX: WCMLX (100000) vs NBSMX (1000000). NBSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.33 vs. WCMLX (27.11). NBSMX return over 5 years is better than : 12.43 vs. WCMLX (0.13).
| NBSMX | WCMLX | NBSMX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.99 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.79 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.866 | 11.410 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 687M | 53.4M | 1,287% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.33 | 27.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.37 | 31.25 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.43 | 0.13 | 9,515% |
| Returns for 10 years | 151.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers