Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSRX vs RWMFX
NBSRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NBSRX vs RWMFX
NBSRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSRX (4.75B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NBSRX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NBSRX (0.00). NBSRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NBSRX (32 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NBSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSRX (10.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSRX: RWMFX (250) vs NBSRX (1000). NBSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.57 vs. RWMFX (8.15). NBSRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.59 vs. RWMFX (27.55).
| NBSRX | RWMFX | NBSRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.503 | 1.616 | 897% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.75B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.57 | 8.15 | 363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.89 | 30.58 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.59 | 27.55 | 133% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.78 | 82.86 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement