Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSRX vs RWMFX
NBSRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NBSRX vs RWMFX
NBSRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSRX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NBSRX (4.7B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NBSRX: RWMFX (1.41) vs NBSRX (0.00). NBSRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NBSRX (33 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NBSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NBSRX (10.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSRX: RWMFX (250) vs NBSRX (1000). NBSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.97 vs. RWMFX (1.33). NBSRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.62 vs. RWMFX (26.42).
| NBSRX | RWMFX | NBSRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.538 | 3.404 | 457% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.7B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.97 | 1.33 | 1,501% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.66 | 29.00 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.62 | 26.42 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.48 | 80.74 | 118% |