Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NBSRX vs RWMFX
NBSRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NBSRX vs RWMFX
NBSRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NBSRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NBSRX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NBSRX (4.66B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NBSRX: RWMFX (1.44) vs NBSRX (0.00). NBSRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NBSRX (32 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NBSRX (0.86) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NBSRX (10.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBSRX: RWMFX (250) vs NBSRX (1000). NBSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.72 vs. RWMFX (5.79). NBSRX return over 5 years is better than : 31.89 vs. RWMFX (28.57).
| NBSRX | RWMFX | NBSRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.31 | 277% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.645 | 3.951 | 345% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 219B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.72 | 5.79 | 392% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.29 | 27.65 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.89 | 28.57 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.42 | 76.81 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement