NCBDF
Price
$31.60
Change
-$2.49 (-7.30%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
15.07B
OLCLF
Price
$23.74
Change
+$0.74 (+3.22%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
63.42B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCBDF vs OLCLF

Header iconNCBDF vs OLCLF Comparison
Open Charts NCBDF vs OLCLFBanner chart's image
Bandai Namco Holdings
Price$31.60
Change-$2.49 (-7.30%)
Volume$2.83K
Capitalization15.07B
Oriental Land
Price$23.74
Change+$0.74 (+3.22%)
Volume$2
Capitalization63.42B
NCBDF vs OLCLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NCBDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCBDF vs. OLCLF commentary
Jul 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCBDF is a Hold and OLCLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 17, 2025
Stock price -- (NCBDF: $30.00 vs. OLCLF: $23.74)
Brand notoriety: NCBDF and OLCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCBDF: 67% vs. OLCLF: 2%
Market capitalization -- NCBDF: $15.07B vs. OLCLF: $63.42B
NCBDF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $15.07B. OLCLF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $63.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCBDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLCLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NCBDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLCLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NCBDF is a better buy in the long-term than OLCLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCBDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLCLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCBDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OLCLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OLCLF is a better buy in the short-term than NCBDF.

Price Growth

NCBDF (@Recreational Products) experienced а -5.06% price change this week, while OLCLF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-1.07% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OLCLF($63.4B) has a higher market cap than NCBDF($15.1B). OLCLF has higher P/E ratio than NCBDF: OLCLF (114.94) vs NCBDF (22.62). NCBDF YTD gains are higher at: 49.057 vs. OLCLF (11.913). NCBDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 158B vs. OLCLF (98.5B). NCBDF has higher revenues than OLCLF: NCBDF (990B) vs OLCLF (436B).
NCBDFOLCLFNCBDF / OLCLF
Capitalization15.1B63.4B24%
EBITDA158B98.5B160%
Gain YTD49.05711.913412%
P/E Ratio22.62114.9420%
Revenue990B436B227%
Total Cash280BN/A-
Total Debt10.8BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCBDF vs OLCLF: Fundamental Ratings
NCBDF
OLCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8946
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NCBDF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLF (50). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to OLCLF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OLCLF (100). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OLCLF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLF (100). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to OLCLF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLF (48). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to OLCLF’s over the last 12 months.

NCBDF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as OLCLF (100). This means that NCBDF’s stock grew similarly to OLCLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCBDFOLCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCBDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZBAI0.500.01
+1.02%
ATIF Holdings Limited
VTR65.19-0.41
-0.62%
Ventas
ALG219.88-4.44
-1.98%
Alamo Group
ATOS0.91-0.02
-2.33%
Atossa Therapeutics
PLPC161.10-8.08
-4.78%
Preformed Line Products Company

NCBDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NCBDF and NCBDY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NCBDF and NCBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NCBDF
1D Price
Change %
NCBDF100%
N/A
NCBDY - NCBDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
ANPDF - NCBDF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NINOY - NCBDF
17%
Poorly correlated
-2.74%
OLCLF - NCBDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNNGY - NCBDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More

OLCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OLCLF and OLCLY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OLCLF and OLCLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLCLF
1D Price
Change %
OLCLF100%
N/A
OLCLY - OLCLF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.96%
PRKS - OLCLF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
NCBDF - OLCLF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLAR - OLCLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
SRM - OLCLF
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.05%
More