Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NCGFX vs RWMFX
NCGFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NCGFX vs RWMFX
NCGFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NCGFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCGFX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NCGFX (571M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NCGFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NCGFX (0.41). NCGFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NCGFX (27 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NCGFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NCGFX (5.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCGFX: RWMFX (250) vs NCGFX (500). NCGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.62 vs. RWMFX (6.50). NCGFX (26.45) and RWMFX (26.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NCGFX | RWMFX | NCGFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.31 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.283 | 1.523 | 544% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 571M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.41 | 1.40 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.62 | 6.50 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.87 | 30.48 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.45 | 26.11 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.72 | 85.69 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement