Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NCGFX vs RWMFX
NCGFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NCGFX vs RWMFX
NCGFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NCGFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Aug 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCGFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NCGFX (584M). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NCGFX: RWMFX (1.42) vs NCGFX (0.42). NCGFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NCGFX (27 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NCGFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NCGFX (5.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCGFX: RWMFX (250) vs NCGFX (500). NCGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. RWMFX (8.16). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 29.96 vs. NCGFX (28.44).
| NCGFX | RWMFX | NCGFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.31 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.31 | 316% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.783 | 7.925 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 584M | 218B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 1.42 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 8.16 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.33 | 33.06 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.44 | 29.96 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.18 | 82.47 | 155% |