NCPL
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.02 (-4.17%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NMR
Price
$9.62
Change
-$0.04 (-0.41%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
27.87B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NCPL vs NMR

NCPL vs NMR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NCPL vs. NMR commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NCPL is a Buy and NMR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (NCPL: $0.46 vs. NMR: $9.62)
Brand notoriety: NCPL and NMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NCPL: 1% vs. NMR: 74%
Market capitalization -- NCPL: $3.62M vs. NMR: $27.87B
NCPL [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $3.62M. NMR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $27.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NCPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMR’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • NCPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NMR’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the long-term than NCPL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NCPL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NCPL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NMR is a better buy in the short-term than NCPL.

Price Growth

NCPL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -16.40% price change this week, while NMR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +3.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

NMR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMR($27.9B) has a higher market cap than NCPL($3.62M). NMR YTD gains are higher at: 14.660 vs. NCPL (-29.968). NCPL has less debt than NMR: NCPL (2.42M) vs NMR (16.6T). NMR has higher revenues than NCPL: NMR (1.8T) vs NCPL (740K).
NCPLNMRNCPL / NMR
Capitalization3.62M27.9B0%
EBITDA-27.6MN/A-
Gain YTD-29.96814.660-204%
P/E RatioN/A13.08-
Revenue740K1.8T0%
Total Cash715KN/A-
Total Debt2.42M16.6T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NCPL vs NMR: Fundamental Ratings
NCPL
NMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5544
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10025
SMR RATING
1..100
993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9918
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMR's Valuation (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NCPL (69) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (100) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's SMR Rating (3) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (99) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as NCPL (65) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew similarly to NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

NMR's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for NCPL (99) in the null industry. This means that NMR’s stock grew significantly faster than NCPL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NCPLNMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NCPL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SOBR1.190.76
+174.75%
Sobr Safe Inc
STLA5.570.07
+1.27%
Stellantis NV
OOMA20.410.23
+1.14%
Ooma
BCIC7.34-0.03
-0.41%
BCP Investment Corporation
DHT17.31-0.45
-2.53%
DHT Holdings

NMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMR has been loosely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMR jumps, then MS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMR
1D Price
Change %
NMR100%
-0.41%
MS - NMR
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
GS - NMR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.88%
MCO - NMR
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
RJF - NMR
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
NDAQ - NMR
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
More