It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NDAQ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NDAQ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
NDAQ (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -2.24% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.83%.
NDAQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
NDAQ | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NDAQ | PALC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago88% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago67% | 19 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 15 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago44% | 2 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDAQ has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDAQ jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDAQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NDAQ | 100% | -0.75% | ||
MCO - NDAQ | 78% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
JEF - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
MS - NDAQ | 71% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
GS - NDAQ | 70% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
RJF - NDAQ | 69% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PALC has been closely correlated with GS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PALC jumps, then GS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PALC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PALC | 100% | -0.72% | ||
GS - PALC | 81% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
MS - PALC | 81% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
AMP - PALC | 78% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
DOV - PALC | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
NDAQ - PALC | 76% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More |