Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PACAX
Nationwide Inv Dest Cnsrv A
Price$10.12
Change+$0.04 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets258.35M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.22
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.77M
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a StrongBuy and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 574M vs. NDCAX (258M). NDCAX (3.51) and PACAX (3.40) have matching dividends . NDCAX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NDCAX (25 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.83). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. NDCAX (28.74). NDCAX (6%) and PACAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PACAX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. NDCAX (2.47). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 10.29 vs. NDCAX (9.35).
| NDCAX | PACAX | NDCAX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.00 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.689 | 7.616 | 75% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 574M | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 3.40 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.47 | 5.69 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.28 | 22.16 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.35 | 10.29 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.07 | 28.06 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement