Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PACAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 839M vs. NDCAX (231M). NDCAX pays higher dividends than PACAX: NDCAX (3.61) vs PACAX (2.71). NDCAX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NDCAX (26 years) vs PACAX (33 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.86). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. NDCAX (32.77). NDCAX (6%) and PACAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PACAX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). NDCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.17 vs. PACAX (3.82). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.31 vs. NDCAX (6.85).
| NDCAX | PACAX | NDCAX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.540 | 3.206 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 231M | 839M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 2.71 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.17 | 3.82 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.68 | 29.45 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.85 | 7.31 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.69 | 37.29 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement