Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PACAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a Buy and PACAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 844M vs. NDCAX (234M). NDCAX pays higher dividends than PACAX: NDCAX (3.61) vs PACAX (3.03). NDCAX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NDCAX (26 years) vs PACAX (32 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.86). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. NDCAX (32.77). NDCAX (6%) and PACAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PACAX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.86 vs. NDCAX (7.43). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.15 vs. NDCAX (8.22).
| NDCAX | PACAX | NDCAX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.142 | 3.962 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 844M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.61 | 3.03 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 8.86 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.77 | 28.88 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.22 | 9.15 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.07 | 37.52 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement