Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison
Open Charts NDCAX vs PACAX
NDCAX vs PACAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NDCAX vs. PACAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NDCAX is a Hold and PACAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 838M vs. NDCAX (233M). NDCAX pays higher dividends than PACAX: NDCAX (3.64) vs PACAX (2.74). NDCAX was incepted earlier than PACAX: NDCAX (26 years) vs PACAX (33 years). PACAX (0.96) is less costly to investors than NDCAX (0.86). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 243.00 vs. NDCAX (32.77). NDCAX (6%) and PACAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDCAX: PACAX (0) vs NDCAX (2000). PACAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. NDCAX (6.27). PACAX (7.41) and NDCAX (7.09) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NDCAX | PACAX | NDCAX / PACAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.440 | 2.935 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 233M | 838M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.64 | 2.74 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.27 | 7.14 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.21 | 27.76 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.09 | 7.41 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.19 | 36.08 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement