Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAGX vs WCMLX
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NEAGX vs WCMLX
Needham Aggressive Growth Retail
Price$55.61
Change-$0.66 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.61
Change-$0.11 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.78M
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAGX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.06B vs. WCMLX (44.8M). NEAGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NEAGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NEAGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NEAGX (1.67). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NEAGX (7.00). NEAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NEAGX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NEAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.33 vs. WCMLX (4.73). NEAGX return over 5 years is better than : 112.90 vs. WCMLX (24.05).
| NEAGX | WCMLX | NEAGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.99 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.79 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.639 | 6.687 | 324% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 44.8M | 2,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.33 | 4.73 | 472% |
| Returns for 3 years | 100.46 | 41.59 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 112.90 | 24.05 | 469% |
| Returns for 10 years | 171.70 | N/A | - |