Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAGX vs WCMLX
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NEAGX vs WCMLX
Needham Aggressive Growth Retail
Price$52.53
Change-$0.13 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets879.98M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.10
Change+$0.15 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.68M
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEAGX has more cash in the bank: 880M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). NEAGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NEAGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NEAGX (24 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NEAGX (1.67). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NEAGX (7.00). NEAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NEAGX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NEAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.19 vs. WCMLX (0.23). NEAGX return over 5 years is better than : 105.70 vs. WCMLX (22.98).
| NEAGX | WCMLX | NEAGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.99 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 1.79 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.835 | 0.700 | 1,977% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 880M | 43.7M | 2,014% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.19 | 0.23 | 4,820% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.83 | 21.94 | 346% |
| Returns for 5 years | 105.70 | 22.98 | 460% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement