Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAGX vs WCMLX
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NEAGX vs WCMLX
NEAGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEAGX has more cash in the bank: 2.34B vs. WCMLX (52M). NEAGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NEAGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NEAGX (25 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) and NEAGX (1.71) have similar cost to investors . WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. NEAGX (16.00). NEAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NEAGX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). NEAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 77.40 vs. WCMLX (21.19). NEAGX return over 5 years is better than : 144.47 vs. WCMLX (-4.96).
| NEAGX | WCMLX | NEAGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.99 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.79 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 51.861 | 8.503 | 610% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 52M | 4,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 77.40 | 21.19 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | 140.48 | 28.93 | 486% |
| Returns for 5 years | 144.47 | -4.96 | -2,910% |
| Returns for 10 years | 341.17 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement