Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RMFCX
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RMFCX
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NEAMX (52.8M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NEAMX: RMFCX (1.15) vs NEAMX (0.70). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NEAMX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NEAMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NEAMX (0.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). NEAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.18 vs. RMFCX (9.14). NEAMX return over 5 years is better than : 59.44 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| NEAMX | RMFCX | NEAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.91 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.877 | 10.454 | 219% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.8M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.15 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.18 | 9.14 | 363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.96 | 38.82 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.44 | 36.70 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.06 | 92.27 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers