Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RMFCX
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RMFCX
NEAMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. NEAMX (58M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NEAMX: RMFCX (1.19) vs NEAMX (0.65). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NEAMX (14 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NEAMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NEAMX (8.32). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RMFCX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). NEAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.22 vs. RMFCX (10.10). NEAMX return over 5 years is better than : 44.79 vs. RMFCX (33.85).
| NEAMX | RMFCX | NEAMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.91 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 0.91 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.831 | 5.845 | 271% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.22 | 10.10 | 329% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.79 | 34.65 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.79 | 33.85 | 132% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.61 | 91.46 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers