Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RWEBX
NEAMX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RWEBX
Neiman Large Cap Value A
Price$37.15
Change+$0.26 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.19M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$68.30
Change+$0.42 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.91B
NEAMX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RWEBX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Buy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 212B vs. NEAMX (41.2M). NEAMX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: NEAMX (0.78) vs RWEBX (0.74). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NEAMX (13 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NEAMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NEAMX (8.32). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RWEBX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). NEAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.65 vs. RWEBX (5.46). NEAMX return over 5 years is better than : 45.55 vs. RWEBX (42.93).
| NEAMX | RWEBX | NEAMX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.06 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.06 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.945 | 12.336 | 154% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 212B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.74 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.65 | 5.46 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.61 | 31.15 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.55 | 42.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.35 | 72.22 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement