Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEAMX vs RWEBX
NEAMX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NEAMX vs RWEBX
Neiman Large Cap Value A
Price$36.15
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.31M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$67.04
Change+$0.13 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets209.11B
NEAMX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEAMX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEAMX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 209B vs. NEAMX (40.3M). NEAMX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: NEAMX (0.81) vs RWEBX (0.76). NEAMX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NEAMX (13 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). NEAMX (1.72) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NEAMX (8.32). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEAMX: RWEBX (250) vs NEAMX (2500). NEAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.48 vs. RWEBX (5.78). NEAMX (49.58) and RWEBX (47.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NEAMX | RWEBX | NEAMX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 1.06 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.06 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.359 | 10.264 | 150% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.3M | 209B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.76 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.48 | 5.78 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.06 | 43.12 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.58 | 47.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.16 | 76.62 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement