Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NECOX vs RMFCX
NECOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NECOX vs RMFCX
NECOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NECOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NECOX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NECOX (842M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NECOX: RMFCX (1.15) vs NECOX (0.30). NECOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NECOX (31 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NECOX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). NECOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NECOX: RMFCX (250) vs NECOX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.75 vs. NECOX (-1.18). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.61 vs. NECOX (-2.73).
| NECOX | RMFCX | NECOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.91 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.91 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.950 | 8.539 | 23% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 842M | 117B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.15 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | 4.75 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.87 | 35.38 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.73 | 35.61 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.75 | 94.16 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers