Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NECOX vs RMFCX
NECOX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NECOX vs RMFCX
NECOX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NECOX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NECOX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NECOX (944M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NECOX: RMFCX (1.16) vs NECOX (0.33). NECOX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NECOX (31 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NECOX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). NECOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NECOX: RMFCX (250) vs NECOX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. NECOX (-2.83). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.23 vs. NECOX (-5.17).
| NECOX | RMFCX | NECOX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.91 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.91 | 195% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.686 | 9.137 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 944M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.16 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.83 | 8.88 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.62 | 34.84 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.17 | 37.23 | -14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.04 | 91.06 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement