NEM
Price
$73.00
Change
+$0.61 (+0.84%)
Updated
Aug 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
79.52B
56 days until earnings call
STPGF
Price
$1.07
Change
-$0.01 (-0.93%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
269.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NEM vs STPGF

Header iconNEM vs STPGF Comparison
Open Charts NEM vs STPGFBanner chart's image
Newmont
Price$73.00
Change+$0.61 (+0.84%)
Volume$89.34K
Capitalization79.52B
Steppe Gold
Price$1.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.93%)
Volume$115.75K
Capitalization269.96M
NEM vs STPGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NEM vs. STPGF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEM is a StrongBuy and STPGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NEM: $72.39 vs. STPGF: $1.07)
Brand notoriety: NEM: Notable vs. STPGF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NEM: 86% vs. STPGF: 321%
Market capitalization -- NEM: $79.52B vs. STPGF: $269.96M
NEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $79.52B. STPGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $269.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NEM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTPGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STPGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STPGF is a better buy in the long-term than NEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NEM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STPGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NEM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STPGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STPGF is a better buy in the short-term than NEM.

Price Growth

NEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.91% price change this week, while STPGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +8.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4218.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.80% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($79.5B) has a higher market cap than STPGF($270M). NEM has higher P/E ratio than STPGF: NEM (13.12) vs STPGF (8.36). STPGF YTD gains are higher at: 148.519 vs. NEM (96.563). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.6B vs. STPGF (81.2M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 6.65B vs. STPGF (107M). STPGF has less debt than NEM: STPGF (156M) vs NEM (7.61B). NEM has higher revenues than STPGF: NEM (20.6B) vs STPGF (148M).
NEMSTPGFNEM / STPGF
Capitalization79.5B270M29,444%
EBITDA11.6B81.2M14,286%
Gain YTD96.563148.51965%
P/E Ratio13.128.36157%
Revenue20.6B148M13,919%
Total Cash6.65B107M6,218%
Total Debt7.61B156M4,876%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NEM vs STPGF: Fundamental Ratings
NEM
STPGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
4420
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7915
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NEM's Valuation (20) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STPGF (58) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as STPGF (100) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew similarly to STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as NEM (44) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that STPGF’s stock grew similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STPGF (36) in the null industry. This means that NEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than STPGF’s over the last 12 months.

STPGF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEM (79) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that STPGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NEMSTPGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STPGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBIH26.660.09
+0.32%
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF
DDWWF5.14N/A
N/A
Dividend Growth Split Corp.
FLUD25.01N/A
-0.02%
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
IXP118.09-0.13
-0.11%
iShares Global Comm Services ETF
ARKK75.52-0.75
-0.98%
ARK Innovation ETF

STPGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STPGF has been loosely correlated with HMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STPGF jumps, then HMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STPGF
1D Price
Change %
STPGF100%
-0.65%
HMY - STPGF
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
PAAS - STPGF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.33%
NEM - STPGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
AEM - STPGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
AGI - STPGF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More