Advertisement
NEON vs OUST
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEON is a Hold and OUST is a Hold.
| NEON | OUST | NEON / OUST | |
| Capitalization | 13.9M | 2.55B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 7.63M | -37.59M | -20% |
| Gain YTD | -52.299 | 63.262 | -83% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.73 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.16M | 205M | 1% |
| Total Cash | 21.3M | 261M | 8% |
| Total Debt | 1.05M | 16.4M | 6% |
NEON | OUST | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 1 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NEON's Valuation (12) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as OUST (28) in the null industry. This means that NEON’s stock grew similarly to OUST’s over the last 12 months.
NEON's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as OUST (100) in the null industry. This means that NEON’s stock grew similarly to OUST’s over the last 12 months.
NEON's SMR Rating (23) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for OUST (95) in the null industry. This means that NEON’s stock grew significantly faster than OUST’s over the last 12 months.
OUST's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NEON (88) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that OUST’s stock grew somewhat faster than NEON’s over the last 12 months.
NEON's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as OUST (100) in the null industry. This means that NEON’s stock grew similarly to OUST’s over the last 12 months.
| NEON | OUST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NEON’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while OUST’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NEON’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- OUST’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NEON’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OUST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NEON’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
- OUST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NEON (@Electronic Components) experienced а -9.88% price change this week, while OUST (@Electronic Components) price change was -3.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
NEON is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
OUST is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (-1.04% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
Advertisement
NEON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NEON and OUST have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NEON and OUST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NEON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEON | 100% | +1.01% | ||
| OUST - NEON | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.28% | ||
| OLED - NEON | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.96% | ||
| LPTH - NEON | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.96% | ||
| LFUS - NEON | 23% Poorly correlated | +4.57% | ||
| OSIS - NEON | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.51% | ||
More | ||||
OUST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OUST has been loosely correlated with KOPN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OUST jumps, then KOPN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OUST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OUST | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| KOPN - OUST | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.99% | ||
| ALNT - OUST | 51% Loosely correlated | +4.76% | ||
| LPTH - OUST | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.96% | ||
| GLW - OUST | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.01% | ||
| FLEX - OUST | 50% Loosely correlated | +7.19% | ||
More | ||||