Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEAX vs RGACX
NFEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NFEAX vs RGACX
NFEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NFEAX (1.39B). NFEAX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . NFEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NFEAX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NFEAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). NFEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEAX: RGACX (250) vs NFEAX (2000). NFEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.91 vs. RGACX (14.24). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 22.53 vs. NFEAX (-15.19).
| NFEAX | RGACX | NFEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.93 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.93 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.323 | 10.291 | 120% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.91 | 14.24 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.00 | 51.07 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.19 | 22.53 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.99 | 107.79 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement