Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEAX vs RGAHX
NFEAX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NFEAX vs RGAHX
NFEAX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEAX vs. RGAHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEAX is a Buy and RGAHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. NFEAX (1.28B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NFEAX: RGAHX (0.41) vs NFEAX (0.00). NFEAX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NFEAX (29 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). NFEAX (1.12) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NFEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEAX: RGAHX (250) vs NFEAX (2000). NFEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. RGAHX (1.64). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.85 vs. NFEAX (-22.94).
| NFEAX | RGAHX | NFEAX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.44 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 0.44 | 255% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.472 | 5.692 | 26% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.28B | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 1.64 | 296% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.20 | 36.31 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.94 | 13.85 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.17 | 99.57 | 26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers