Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGACX
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$22.56
Change-$0.23 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.65
Change-$0.31 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.36B
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NFEPX (1.33B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: RGACX (0.07) vs NFEPX (0.00). NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NFEPX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.86). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGACX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). NFEPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.60 vs. RGACX (10.09). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.57 vs. NFEPX (-9.35).
| NFEPX | RGACX | NFEPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.256 | 17.586 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 10.09 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 88.66 | 77.52 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.35 | 37.57 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.60 | 95.94 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement