Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGEBX
NFEPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGEBX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$22.42
Change-$0.14 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.33B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.10
Change-$0.41 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
NFEPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NFEPX (1.33B). NFEPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NFEPX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.86). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGEBX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). NFEPX (16.65) and RGEBX (15.90) have marching annual gain over last year. RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 44.66 vs. NFEPX (-2.97).
| NFEPX | RGEBX | NFEPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.09 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.144 | 17.721 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.33B | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.65 | 15.90 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.65 | 59.93 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.97 | 44.66 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.87 | 95.34 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement