Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.28B vs. NFRFX (1.59B). TRIZX (8.25) and NFRFX (8.23) have matching dividends . NFRFX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: NFRFX (10 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). NFRFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.62). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. NFRFX (24.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: TRIZX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.50 vs. NFRFX (7.98). NFRFX (44.71) and TRIZX (44.39) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NFRFX | TRIZX | NFRFX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.02 | 3,350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.62 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.101 | 3.505 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.59B | 4.28B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.23 | 8.25 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.98 | 8.50 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.24 | 34.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.71 | 44.39 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.36 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement