Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.36B vs. NFRFX (1.61B). NFRFX (8.07) and TRIZX (8.00) have matching dividends . NFRFX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: NFRFX (11 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). NFRFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. NFRFX (24.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: TRIZX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.23 vs. NFRFX (7.51). TRIZX (41.35) and NFRFX (40.86) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NFRFX | TRIZX | NFRFX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.02 | 3,350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.61 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.308 | 4.913 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 4.36B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.07 | 8.00 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.51 | 8.23 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.00 | 31.83 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.86 | 41.35 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.83 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement