Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.35B vs. NFRFX (2.03B). NFRFX (7.99) and TRIZX (7.94) have matching dividends . NFRFX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: NFRFX (11 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). NFRFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. NFRFX (24.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: TRIZX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.58 vs. NFRFX (6.77). TRIZX (41.53) and NFRFX (41.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NFRFX | TRIZX | NFRFX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.02 | 3,350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.61 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.482 | 5.120 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 4.35B | 47% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.99 | 7.94 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.77 | 7.58 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.79 | 33.96 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.03 | 41.53 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.87 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement