Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.33B vs. NFRFX (1.6B). NFRFX (8.14) and TRIZX (8.13) have matching dividends . NFRFX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: NFRFX (11 years) vs TRIZX (5 years). NFRFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. NFRFX (24.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: TRIZX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). TRIZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.26 vs. NFRFX (7.53). NFRFX (42.04) and TRIZX (41.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NFRFX | TRIZX | NFRFX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.02 | 3,350% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.61 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.502 | 4.085 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.6B | 4.33B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.14 | 8.13 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 8.26 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.65 | 30.64 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.04 | 41.97 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement