Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison
Open Charts NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFRFX vs. TRIZX commentary
Aug 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFRFX is a StrongBuy and TRIZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.01B vs. NFRFX (2.13B). TRIZX pays higher dividends than NFRFX: TRIZX (7.56) vs NFRFX (7.13). NFRFX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: NFRFX (12 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). NFRFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.40 vs. NFRFX (49.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: TRIZX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). TRIZX (5.92) and NFRFX (5.69) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 39.62 vs. NFRFX (34.07).
| NFRFX | TRIZX | NFRFX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.02 | 3,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.61 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.923 | 2.658 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.13B | 4.01B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.13 | 7.56 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.69 | 5.92 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.15 | 26.88 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.07 | 39.62 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement