Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison
Open Charts NFRFX vs TRIZX
NFRFX vs TRIZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFRFX vs. TRIZX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFRFX is a Hold and TRIZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIZX has more cash in the bank: 4.03B vs. NFRFX (2.04B). TRIZX (7.59) and NFRFX (7.25) have matching dividends . NFRFX was incepted earlier than TRIZX: NFRFX (11 years) vs TRIZX (6 years). NFRFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than TRIZX (0.61). TRIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.90 vs. NFRFX (49.00). TRIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: TRIZX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). TRIZX (5.47) and NFRFX (5.34) have marching annual gain over last year. TRIZX return over 5 years is better than : 38.37 vs. NFRFX (33.80).
| NFRFX | TRIZX | NFRFX / TRIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.02 | 3,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.61 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.123 | 1.653 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 4.03B | 51% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.25 | 7.59 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.34 | 5.47 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.66 | 27.42 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.80 | 38.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement