Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDLX vs RGACX
NGDLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDLX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$32.40
Change+$0.15 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.6B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$81.05
Change+$0.25 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
NGDLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDLX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDLX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. NGDLX (2.6B). NGDLX pays higher dividends than RGACX: NGDLX (0.10) vs RGACX (0.07). NGDLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDLX (16 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NGDLX (0.66). NGDLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDLX: RGACX (250) vs NGDLX (1000000). NGDLX (18.64) and RGACX (17.93) have marching annual gain over last year. NGDLX return over 5 years is better than : 52.11 vs. RGACX (40.64).
| NGDLX | RGACX | NGDLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.656 | 12.585 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.6B | 325B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.10 | 0.07 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.64 | 17.93 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.26 | 45.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.11 | 40.64 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.56 | 81.98 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement