Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDLX vs RGACX
NGDLX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDLX vs RGACX
NGDLX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDLX vs. RGACX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDLX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. NGDLX (2.59B). NGDLX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . NGDLX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDLX (17 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than NGDLX (0.65). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NGDLX (30.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDLX: RGACX (250) vs NGDLX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. NGDLX (4.34). NGDLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.88 vs. RGACX (13.23).
| NGDLX | RGACX | NGDLX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.341 | 6.185 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.34 | 7.94 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.41 | 43.05 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.88 | 13.23 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.81 | 107.97 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement