Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PRFHX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.67
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.25B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.67
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.21B
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PRFHX commentary
Aug 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. PRFHX (3.21B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHCCX (4.70) vs PRFHX (4.09). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHCCX (11 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). PRFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: PRFHX (2500) vs NHCCX (3000). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.53 vs. NHCCX (-6.75). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 4.75 vs. NHCCX (-0.41).
| NHCCX | PRFHX | NHCCX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.63 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.63 | 462% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.033 | -2.075 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 3.21B | 411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.70 | 4.09 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.75 | -1.53 | 442% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.37 | 4.37 | -100% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.41 | 4.75 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.44 | 17.98 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement