Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PRFHX
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
T. Rowe Price Tax-Free High Yield
Price$10.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.26B
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PRFHX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. PRFHX (3.26B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHCCX (4.57) vs PRFHX (4.00). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHCCX (11 years) vs PRFHX (40 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.63). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). PRFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: PRFHX (2500) vs NHCCX (3000). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.70 vs. NHCCX (-3.91). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 7.44 vs. NHCCX (2.50).
| NHCCX | PRFHX | NHCCX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.63 | 462% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.91 | 0.63 | 462% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.061 | -1.326 | 231% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000 | 2500 | 120% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.4B | 3.26B | 412% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.57 | 4.00 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.91 | 0.70 | -562% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.14 | 8.66 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.50 | 7.44 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.30 | 19.48 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement