Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PRFHX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. PRFHX (3.55B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHCCX (4.72) vs PRFHX (4.17). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHCCX (13 years) vs PRFHX (42 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.64). PRFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.80 vs. NHCCX (15.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: NHCCX (200) vs PRFHX (2500). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.07 vs. NHCCX (7.54). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 4.63 vs. NHCCX (-5.12).
| NHCCX | PRFHX | NHCCX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.64 | 438% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.64 | 438% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.250 | 2.143 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 2500 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 3.55B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.72 | 4.17 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 8.07 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.79 | 18.19 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.12 | 4.63 | -111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.44 | 19.57 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement