Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PRFHX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. PRFHX (3.53B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHCCX (4.72) vs PRFHX (4.17). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHCCX (12 years) vs PRFHX (41 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.64). PRFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.80 vs. NHCCX (15.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: NHCCX (200) vs PRFHX (2500). PRFHX (8.27) and NHCCX (8.16) have marching annual gain over last year. PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 4.41 vs. NHCCX (-5.31).
| NHCCX | PRFHX | NHCCX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.64 | 438% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.64 | 438% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.538 | 2.328 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 2500 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 3.53B | 354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.72 | 4.17 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 8.27 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.65 | 17.63 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.31 | 4.41 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.14 | 20.17 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers