Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PRFHX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. PRFHX (3.64B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHCCX (4.63) vs PRFHX (4.07). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHCCX (12 years) vs PRFHX (41 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.64). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PRFHX (14.20). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: NHCCX (200) vs PRFHX (2500). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.30 vs. NHCCX (8.36). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 6.53 vs. NHCCX (-3.22).
| NHCCX | PRFHX | NHCCX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.64 | 438% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.80 | 0.64 | 438% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.680 | 2.985 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 2500 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 3.64B | 349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.63 | 4.07 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | 9.30 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.25 | 17.79 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.22 | 6.53 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.01 | 22.08 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers