Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHCCX vs PRFHX
NHCCX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHCCX vs. PRFHX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHCCX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. PRFHX (3.53B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHCCX (4.75) vs PRFHX (4.15). NHCCX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHCCX (13 years) vs PRFHX (42 years). NHCCX (2.70) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.64). PRFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.80 vs. NHCCX (15.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFHX: NHCCX (200) vs PRFHX (2500). PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. NHCCX (-1.48). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 2.13 vs. NHCCX (-8.58).
| NHCCX | PRFHX | NHCCX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 0.64 | 422% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.70 | 0.64 | 422% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.253 | -0.292 | 771% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 200 | 2500 | 8% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 3.53B | 335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.75 | 4.15 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.48 | 1.28 | -116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.17 | 15.36 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.58 | 2.13 | -403% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.31 | 17.12 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement