NHHEF vs SMIZF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHHEF is a Hold and SMIZF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHHEF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMIZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NHHEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SMIZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMIZF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SMIZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
NHHEF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а +38.46% price change this week, while SMIZF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+0.68% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| NHHEF | SMIZF | NHHEF / SMIZF | |
| Capitalization | 2.1B | 1.62B | 130% |
| EBITDA | 637M | 392M | 163% |
| Gain YTD | 19.601 | 26.256 | 75% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 7.07 | - |
| Revenue | 2.03B | 1.51B | 135% |
| Total Cash | 289M | 138M | 209% |
| Total Debt | 2.48B | 3.04B | 82% |
NHHEF | SMIZF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 30 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMIZF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as NHHEF (57). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew similarly to NHHEF’s over the last 12 months.
NHHEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SMIZF (100). This means that NHHEF’s stock grew similarly to SMIZF’s over the last 12 months.
SMIZF's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHHEF (89). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHHEF’s over the last 12 months.
NHHEF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SMIZF (45). This means that NHHEF’s stock grew similarly to SMIZF’s over the last 12 months.
NHHEF's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as SMIZF (70). This means that NHHEF’s stock grew similarly to SMIZF’s over the last 12 months.
| NHHEF | SMIZF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 8% | 3 days ago 44% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 5% | 3 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 47% |
NHHEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NHHEF and ACRFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHHEF and ACRFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHHEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHHEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ACRFF - NHHEF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WTBDY - NHHEF | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.06% | ||
| ATAT - NHHEF | 3% Poorly correlated | +4.60% | ||
| SHCO - NHHEF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| MNRIF - NHHEF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SMIZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMIZF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMIZF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMIZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMIZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WTBDY - SMIZF | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.26% | ||
| ATAT - SMIZF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.19% | ||
| MNRIF - SMIZF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NHHEF - SMIZF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHCO - SMIZF | -0% Poorly correlated | -2.77% | ||
More | ||||