This stock comparison pits NHI against OHI, two prominent healthcare REITs focused on senior housing and skilled nursing facilities. Investors seeking stable dividends in the growing long-term care sector, driven by an aging population, will find value here. Amid recent market volatility, their relative performance, yields, and positioning offer insights into sector trends and trade-offs for portfolio diversification or income strategies. This analysis highlights key metrics and developments for informed relative performance evaluation.
National Health Investors, Inc. (NHI) is a self-managed REIT that invests primarily in senior housing, skilled nursing, and medical properties through sale-leasebacks, joint ventures, mortgages, and mezzanine financing. With a portfolio emphasizing long-term leases, it benefits from healthcare demand tailwinds. In recent market activity, NHI has traded around $77, within its 52-week range of $68.80 to $91.38, reflecting moderate stability. Sentiment has been buoyed by positive senior housing narratives and analyst upgrades, such as Truist's price target increase to $92, alongside Q4 2025 results showing gains from equity sales agreements. However, year-to-date returns lag at 1.96%, influenced by broader REIT sector pressures.
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc. (OHI) operates as a REIT financing skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), assisted living, and other long-term healthcare assets via mortgages, loans, and leases. Its larger scale supports diversified operator relationships. Recently, OHI has hovered near $46.41, close to its 52-week high of $49.14 from a low of $35.09, indicating robust momentum. Key drivers include strong Q4 2025 AFFO growth exceeding 8% year-over-year and consistent dividend declarations, fostering positive investor sentiment. Year-to-date performance stands at 6.24%, outperforming peers amid favorable healthcare leasing dynamics.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from its library of 351 AI Trading Bots, each designed for diverse strategies across thousands of tickers. These curated bots adapt to current market conditions, featuring annualized returns ranging from +15% to +168%, win rates up to 88%, and profit factors as high as 11.7. Trading styles span trend following, signal agents, and multi-agent systems with timeframes from 5 minutes to 55 days, targeting assets like semiconductors, tech giants, and ETFs. This selection highlights bots with proven edge in volatile environments. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify strategies aligning with your trading timeframe and risk profile.
Both NHI and OHI operate in healthcare REITs, leveraging sale-leasebacks and financing for demographic-driven demand, but OHI's SNF-heavy portfolio contrasts NHI's senior housing tilt, exposing OHI more to operator risks while NHI gains from assisted living growth. OHI edges in momentum with superior one-year returns around 31% versus 7%, and a higher yield, but trades at a comparable P/E near 24. Risk profiles align with low betas, though NHI shows slightly higher volatility. Market sentiment favors OHI's scale and AFFO trajectory amid recent leasing upticks.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward OHI based on trend consistency, elevated dividend yield, larger market positioning, and stronger relative performance in recent quarters. While NHI offers diversification in senior housing, OHI's catalysts suggest higher probability of outperformance in the near term, barring sector-wide shifts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileOHI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NHI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OHI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
NHI (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -3.90% price change this week, while OHI (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was -4.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.28%.
NHI is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
OHI is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| NHI | OHI | NHI / OHI | |
| Capitalization | 3.41B | 13.2B | 26% |
| EBITDA | 287M | 1.21B | 24% |
| Gain YTD | -6.737 | 3.272 | -206% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.72 | 21.48 | 106% |
| Revenue | 401M | 1.24B | 32% |
| Total Cash | 24.9M | 26.1M | 95% |
| Total Debt | 1.27B | 4.44B | 29% |
NHI | OHI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 64 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 43 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NHI's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as OHI (61). This means that NHI’s stock grew similarly to OHI’s over the last 12 months.
OHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHI (54). This means that OHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHI’s over the last 12 months.
OHI's SMR Rating (64) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHI (72). This means that OHI’s stock grew similarly to NHI’s over the last 12 months.
OHI's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHI (61). This means that OHI’s stock grew similarly to NHI’s over the last 12 months.
NHI's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as OHI (60). This means that NHI’s stock grew similarly to OHI’s over the last 12 months.
| NHI | OHI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 4 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 60% | 20 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 52% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 51% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHI has been closely correlated with LTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NHI jumps, then LTC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHI | 100% | +3.09% | ||
| LTC - NHI | 74% Closely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| VTR - NHI | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.69% | ||
| SBRA - NHI | 63% Loosely correlated | +4.47% | ||
| FCPT - NHI | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| CTRE - NHI | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OHI has been closely correlated with CTRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OHI jumps, then CTRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OHI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OHI | 100% | +1.83% | ||
| CTRE - OHI | 71% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| SBRA - OHI | 71% Closely correlated | +4.47% | ||
| LTC - OHI | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.41% | ||
| WELL - OHI | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| VTR - OHI | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.69% | ||
More | ||||