Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs ORNAX
NHMAX vs ORNAX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs ORNAX
NHMAX vs ORNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. ORNAX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and ORNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. ORNAX (8.7B). NHMAX (5.52) and ORNAX (5.48) have matching dividends . NHMAX was incepted earlier than ORNAX: NHMAX (27 years) vs ORNAX (33 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than ORNAX (1.37). ORNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NHMAX (15.00). ORNAX (4%) and NHMAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ORNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMAX: ORNAX (1000) vs NHMAX (2500). NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.48 vs. ORNAX (7.38). ORNAX return over 5 years is better than : 0.99 vs. NHMAX (-1.12).
| NHMAX | ORNAX | NHMAX / ORNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.37 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.37 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.867 | 1.464 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 99% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 8.7B | 144% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.52 | 5.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.48 | 7.38 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.61 | 13.95 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.12 | 0.99 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.71 | 33.72 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement