Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs ORNAX
NHMAX vs ORNAX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs ORNAX
NHMAX vs ORNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. ORNAX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and ORNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. ORNAX (8.85B). NHMAX (5.37) and ORNAX (5.35) have matching dividends . NHMAX was incepted earlier than ORNAX: NHMAX (27 years) vs ORNAX (33 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than ORNAX (1.17). ORNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. NHMAX (18.00). ORNAX (4%) and NHMAX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. ORNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHMAX: ORNAX (1000) vs NHMAX (2500). NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. ORNAX (7.66). ORNAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.44 vs. NHMAX (1.58).
| NHMAX | ORNAX | NHMAX / ORNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.17 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.17 | 171% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.419 | 3.806 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 99% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 8.85B | 146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.37 | 5.35 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 7.66 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.22 | 13.48 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.58 | 3.44 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.69 | 36.84 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers