Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs PATFX
NHMAX vs PATFX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs PATFX
NHMAX vs PATFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. PATFX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and PATFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. PATFX (3.53B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than PATFX: NHMAX (5.57) vs PATFX (3.76). NHMAX was incepted earlier than PATFX: NHMAX (27 years) vs PATFX (14 years). NHMAX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PATFX (1.01). PATFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.80 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX (2500) and PATFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PATFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.82 vs. NHMAX (-0.76). PATFX return over 5 years is better than : 0.35 vs. NHMAX (-4.80).
| NHMAX | PATFX | NHMAX / PATFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.01 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.01 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.725 | -0.613 | 281% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 3.53B | 335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.57 | 3.76 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.76 | 0.82 | -92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.75 | 14.00 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.80 | 0.35 | -1,367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.27 | 14.55 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement