Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs PATFX
NHMAX vs PATFX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs PATFX
NHMAX vs PATFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. PATFX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and PATFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.7B vs. PATFX (3.64B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than PATFX: NHMAX (5.42) vs PATFX (3.69). NHMAX was incepted earlier than PATFX: NHMAX (27 years) vs PATFX (14 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than PATFX (1.01). NHMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PATFX (14.20). NHMAX (2500) and PATFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX (9.31) and PATFX (8.94) have marching annual gain over last year. PATFX return over 5 years is better than : 4.75 vs. NHMAX (0.78).
| NHMAX | PATFX | NHMAX / PATFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.01 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.01 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.092 | 2.812 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 3.64B | 349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.42 | 3.69 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.31 | 8.94 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.93 | 16.50 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.78 | 4.75 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.21 | 19.47 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement