Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs PATFX
NHMAX vs PATFX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs PATFX
NHMAX vs PATFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. PATFX commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and PATFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.9B vs. PATFX (3.69B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than PATFX: NHMAX (5.37) vs PATFX (3.68). NHMAX was incepted earlier than PATFX: NHMAX (27 years) vs PATFX (14 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than PATFX (1.01). NHMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.00 vs. PATFX (14.20). NHMAX (2500) and PATFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX (9.57) and PATFX (9.22) have marching annual gain over last year. PATFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.49 vs. NHMAX (1.58).
| NHMAX | PATFX | NHMAX / PATFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.01 | 198% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.01 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.419 | 3.852 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.9B | 3.69B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.37 | 3.68 | 146% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 9.22 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.22 | 17.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.58 | 5.49 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.69 | 19.28 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers