Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs PRFHX
NHMAX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs PRFHX
NHMAX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. PRFHX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. PRFHX (3.55B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHMAX (5.52) vs PRFHX (4.17). NHMAX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHMAX (27 years) vs PRFHX (42 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.64). PRFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.80 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX (2500) and PRFHX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX (8.32) and PRFHX (8.07) have marching annual gain over last year. PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 4.63 vs. NHMAX (-1.21).
| NHMAX | PRFHX | NHMAX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.64 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.64 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.722 | 2.143 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 3.55B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.52 | 4.17 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 8.07 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.45 | 18.19 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.21 | 4.63 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.53 | 19.57 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement