Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs PRFHX
NHMAX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs PRFHX
NHMAX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. PRFHX commentary
Aug 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. PRFHX (3.53B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHMAX (5.52) vs PRFHX (4.17). NHMAX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHMAX (27 years) vs PRFHX (41 years). NHMAX (2.00) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.64). PRFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.80 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX (2500) and PRFHX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NHMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.03 vs. PRFHX (8.27). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 4.41 vs. NHMAX (-1.46).
| NHMAX | PRFHX | NHMAX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.64 | 313% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.64 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.011 | 2.328 | 86% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 3.53B | 354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.52 | 4.17 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.03 | 8.27 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.28 | 17.63 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.46 | 4.41 | -33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.29 | 20.17 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement