Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NHMAX vs PRFHX
NHMAX vs PRFHX Comparison
Open Charts NHMAX vs PRFHX
NHMAX vs PRFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NHMAX vs. PRFHX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAX is a Hold and PRFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAX has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. PRFHX (3.53B). NHMAX pays higher dividends than PRFHX: NHMAX (5.57) vs PRFHX (4.15). NHMAX was incepted earlier than PRFHX: NHMAX (27 years) vs PRFHX (42 years). NHMAX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PRFHX (0.64). PRFHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 18.80 vs. NHMAX (15.00). NHMAX (2500) and PRFHX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PRFHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.28 vs. NHMAX (-0.76). PRFHX return over 5 years is better than : 2.13 vs. NHMAX (-4.80).
| NHMAX | PRFHX | NHMAX / PRFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.64 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.64 | 297% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.725 | -0.292 | 590% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.8B | 3.53B | 335% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.57 | 4.15 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.76 | 1.28 | -59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.75 | 15.36 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.80 | 2.13 | -226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.27 | 17.12 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement