Advertisement
NHPAP vs PFFR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHPAP is a Hold and PFFR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHPAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- NHPAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NHPAP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- NHPAP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NHPAP (@Managed Health Care) experienced а -1.14% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.91%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+0.76% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
NHPAP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| NHPAP | PFFR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 44% | 13 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% | 3 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
NHPAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHPAP has been loosely correlated with EXR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHPAP jumps, then EXR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHPAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHPAP | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| EXR - NHPAP | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| CUBE - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| PCH - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
| STAG - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| PSA - NHPAP | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||
PFFR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFFR has been loosely correlated with BPYPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PFFR jumps, then BPYPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFFR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFR | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| BPYPO - PFFR | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| LANDO - PFFR | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| BPYPN - PFFR | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| LANDP - PFFR | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
| NHPAP - PFFR | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
More | ||||