NHPBP
Price
$25.33
Change
-$0.06 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UE
Price
$20.57
Change
-$0.13 (-0.63%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
2.6B
53 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NHPBP vs UE

NHPBP vs UE Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NHPBP vs. UE commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHPBP is a Hold and UE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHPBP YTD gains are higher at: 47.565 vs. UE (9.253). UE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 282M vs. NHPBP (85.2M). NHPBP has more cash in the bank: 246M vs. UE (58.3M). NHPBP has less debt than UE: NHPBP (861M) vs UE (1.74B). UE has higher revenues than NHPBP: UE (495M) vs NHPBP (344M).
NHPBPUENHPBP / UE
CapitalizationN/A2.6B-
EBITDA85.2M282M30%
Gain YTD47.5659.253514%
P/E RatioN/A38.81-
Revenue344M495M69%
Total Cash246M58.3M422%
Total Debt861M1.74B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UE: Fundamental Ratings
UE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
53
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
82
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NHPBPUE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (NHPBP: $25.33 vs. UE: $20.57)
Brand notoriety: NHPBP and UE are both not notable
NHPBP represents the Publishing: Books/Magazines, while UE is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NHPBP: 25% vs. UE: 71%
Market capitalization -- NHPBP: $0 vs. UE: $2.6B
NHPBP [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] is valued at $0. UE’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry ranges from $113.09K to $169.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $51.9K to $243.79B. The average market capitalization across the [@Publishing: Books/Magazines] industry is $17.01B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $9.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NHPBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while UE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NHPBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UE is a better buy in the long-term than NHPBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NHPBP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NHPBP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NHPBP and UE are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NHPBP (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а +0.04% price change this week, while UE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -1.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

UE is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-1.02% weekly)

The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.24% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

View a ticker or compare two or three
NHPBP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSII13.490.05
+0.37%
REX TSLA Growth & Income ETF
NZF11.520.02
+0.17%
Nuveen Municipal Credit Income Fund
SAUG27.580.05
+0.16%
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Aug
DVXB20.36N/A
N/A
Webs Defined Volatility Xlb ETF
SPXU35.10-0.87
-2.42%
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500

NHPBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHPBP and NHPAP have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHPBP and NHPAP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHPBP
1D Price
Change %
NHPBP100%
-0.24%
NHPAP - NHPBP
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FR - NHPBP
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
UE - NHPBP
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
BRX - NHPBP
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
OUT - NHPBP
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
More

UE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UE has been closely correlated with KRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UE jumps, then KRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UE
1D Price
Change %
UE100%
-0.63%
KRG - UE
76%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
BRX - UE
74%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
KIM - UE
73%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
FR - UE
72%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
PECO - UE
72%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
More