Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIAGX vs RSEBX
NIAGX vs RSEBX Comparison
Open Charts NIAGX vs RSEBX
NIAGX vs RSEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSEBX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. NIAGX (92.1M). RSEBX pays higher dividends than NIAGX: RSEBX (0.29) vs NIAGX (0.25). NIAGX was incepted earlier than RSEBX: NIAGX (4 years) vs RSEBX (12 years). RSEBX (1.45) is less costly to investors than NIAGX (1.35). RSEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NIAGX (29.00). RSEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIAGX: RSEBX (250) vs NIAGX (1000). RSEBX (14.73) and NIAGX (14.25) have marching annual gain over last year.
| NIAGX | RSEBX | NIAGX / RSEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.45 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.45 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.773 | 16.636 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.1M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.29 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | 14.73 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.47 | 37.47 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -4.70 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers