Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIAGX vs RSLBX
NIAGX vs RSLBX Comparison
Open Charts NIAGX vs RSLBX
NIAGX vs RSLBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSLBX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. NIAGX (92.1M). NIAGX pays higher dividends than RSLBX: NIAGX (0.25) vs RSLBX (0.15). NIAGX was incepted earlier than RSLBX: NIAGX (4 years) vs RSLBX (24 years). RSLBX (1.74) is less costly to investors than NIAGX (1.35). RSLBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NIAGX (29.00). RSLBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIAGX: RSLBX (250) vs NIAGX (1000). NIAGX (14.25) and RSLBX (13.70) have marching annual gain over last year.
| NIAGX | RSLBX | NIAGX / RSLBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.74 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.773 | 16.414 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.1M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.15 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.25 | 13.70 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.47 | 35.42 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -7.80 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 67.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers