Advertisement
NIQ vs PZA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQ is a Hold and PZA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NIQ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- NIQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
NIQ (@Packaged Software) experienced а +0.75% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.12%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.20% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
NIQ | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 52 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| PZA | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 52% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 62% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 44% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HOOX | 115.77 | 3.62 | +3.23% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF | |||
| MAPP | 25.14 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF | |||
| MMT | 4.72 | N/A | N/A |
| MFS Multimarket Income Trust | |||
| RODM | 34.97 | -0.07 | -0.20% |
| Hartford Multifactor Dev Mkts (exUS) ETF | |||
| FXA | 64.32 | -0.46 | -0.70% |
| Invesco CcyShrs® Australian Dllr Trust | |||
PZA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PZA and NIQ have been poorly correlated (+-6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PZA and NIQ's prices will move in lockstep.