Advertisement
AMOD vs NIQ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOD is a Hold and NIQ is a Hold.
| AMOD | NIQ | AMOD / NIQ | |
| Capitalization | 11.1M | 5.26B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -6.83M | 710M | -1% |
| Gain YTD | -87.829 | 8.187 | -1,073% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 7.14K | 4.39B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2M | 417M | 0% |
| Total Debt | 6.24M | 3.8B | 0% |
AMOD | NIQ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 73 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 59 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NIQ's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMOD (93). This means that NIQ’s stock grew significantly faster than AMOD’s over the last 12 months.
NIQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as AMOD (100). This means that NIQ’s stock grew similarly to AMOD’s over the last 12 months.
NIQ's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as AMOD (100). This means that NIQ’s stock grew similarly to AMOD’s over the last 12 months.
NIQ's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMOD (97). This means that NIQ’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMOD’s over the last 12 months.
NIQ's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as AMOD (100). This means that NIQ’s stock grew similarly to AMOD’s over the last 12 months.
| AMOD | NIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 38% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 34% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 16 days ago 37% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 36% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 32% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMOD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while NIQ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMOD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NIQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMOD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NIQ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMOD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- NIQ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMOD (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.23% price change this week, while NIQ (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMOD is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
NIQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWJ | 98.56 | 2.12 | +2.20% |
| iShares MSCI Japan ETF | |||
| SCO | 20.61 | 0.28 | +1.38% |
| ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | |||
| KJUL | 33.48 | 0.12 | +0.36% |
| Innovator Russell 2000 Pwr Bffr ETF™ Jul | |||
| BELT | 40.04 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Long-Term U.S. Equity ETF | |||
| IWMW | 38.48 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
| iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF | |||
AMOD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMOD and NOW have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMOD and NOW's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOD | 100% | +7.18% | ||
| NOW - AMOD | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| FTFT - AMOD | 30% Poorly correlated | +40.49% | ||
| FRGT - AMOD | 29% Poorly correlated | -11.22% | ||
| NIQ - AMOD | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| WK - AMOD | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||
NIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NIQ has been loosely correlated with PAYX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NIQ jumps, then PAYX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIQ | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| PAYX - NIQ | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| TTAN - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| WDAY - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TYL - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SSNC - NIQ | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||