Ad is loading...
NIQCX vs VTMGX
NIQCX vs VTMGX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs VTMGX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$13.01
Change+$0.09 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01B
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Admiral
Price$16.29
Change+$0.18 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.73B
NIQCX vs VTMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. VTMGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Buy and VTMGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTMGX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. NIQCX (1.01B). VTMGX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: VTMGX (3.05) vs NIQCX (0.39). NIQCX was incepted earlier than VTMGX: NIQCX (12 years) vs VTMGX (26 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than VTMGX (0.05). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. VTMGX (3.00). NIQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTMGX: NIQCX (1000) vs VTMGX (3000). VTMGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.46 vs. NIQCX (3.94). VTMGX return over 5 years is better than : 46.39 vs. NIQCX (16.74).
| NIQCX | VTMGX | NIQCX / VTMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.05 | 4,020% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.05 | 4,380% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.277 | 5.017 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.01B | 205B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 3.05 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.94 | 5.46 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.73 | 8.98 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.74 | 46.39 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.37 | 29.25 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...