Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCAX vs RGABX
NLCAX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts NLCAX vs RGABX
NLCAX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCAX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCAX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NLCAX (737M). NLCAX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCAX was incepted earlier than RGABX: NLCAX (29 years) vs RGABX (24 years). RGABX (1.38) is less costly to investors than NLCAX (0.89). NLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGABX (32.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCAX: RGABX (250) vs NLCAX (1000). RGABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.94 vs. NLCAX (-8.02). RGABX return over 5 years is better than : 5.33 vs. NLCAX (-12.53).
| NLCAX | RGABX | NLCAX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.38 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.034 | 8.489 | 48% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | -1.94 | 414% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.12 | 35.88 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.53 | 5.33 | -235% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.41 | 86.62 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers