Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCAX vs RGAFX
NLCAX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts NLCAX vs RGAFX
NLCAX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCAX vs. RGAFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCAX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NLCAX (737M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than NLCAX: RGAFX (0.46) vs NLCAX (0.00). NLCAX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: NLCAX (29 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). NLCAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). NLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. RGAFX (32.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCAX: RGAFX (250) vs NLCAX (1000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.42 vs. NLCAX (-8.02). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.74 vs. NLCAX (-12.53).
| NLCAX | RGAFX | NLCAX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.34 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.34 | 262% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.034 | 9.276 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 737M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.02 | 0.42 | -1,918% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.12 | 44.36 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.53 | 14.74 | -85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.41 | 109.80 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers