Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCAX vs RGEBX
NLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCAX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth A
Price$55.64
Change+$0.51 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets841.67M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.45
Change+$0.59 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
NLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NLCAX (842M). NLCAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCAX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NLCAX (0.84). NLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCAX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCAX (1000). NLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.61 vs. RGEBX (17.04). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. NLCAX (13.46).
| NLCAX | RGEBX | NLCAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.09 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.212 | 17.385 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 842M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.61 | 17.04 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.52 | 57.65 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.46 | 45.42 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.51 | 93.79 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement