Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCAX vs RGEBX
NLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCAX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth A
Price$55.07
Change-$0.66 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets831.95M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.95
Change-$0.57 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
NLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCAX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. NLCAX (832M). NLCAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCAX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NLCAX (0.89). NLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCAX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCAX (1000). NLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.87 vs. RGEBX (6.39). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. NLCAX (5.54).
| NLCAX | RGEBX | NLCAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.09 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.09 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.090 | 14.712 | 82% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 832M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.87 | 6.39 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.79 | 59.35 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.54 | 29.69 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.37 | 80.59 | 95% |