NLR
Price
$90.38
Change
-$0.46 (-0.51%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
3.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SETM
Price
$24.57
Change
-$0.19 (-0.77%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
448.28M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs SETM

NLR vs SETM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) offers concentrated exposure to the nuclear energy value chain with approximately 28 holdings, while Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) provides broader diversification across critical materials with roughly 157 holdings.
  • NLR maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.52% compared to SETM’s 0.65%, reflecting its narrower thematic focus on uranium mining, nuclear utilities, and reactor components.
  • Both ETFs are passively managed and track rules-based indices, but NLR emphasizes nuclear power infrastructure whereas SETM spans uranium, copper, rare earths, lithium, and other energy-transition materials.
  • NLR’s sector allocation is heavily weighted toward utilities with a large-cap tilt, while SETM delivers multi-commodity exposure that may exhibit higher volatility due to its wider scope.
  • In the current environment of rising electricity demand and energy-transition policies, NLR provides targeted nuclear exposure, whereas SETM captures a broader basket of materials essential for electrification and decarbonization.
  • Structural differences in concentration and cost position NLR as a more specialized, lower-cost option and SETM as a diversified thematic vehicle within overlapping critical-materials themes.

Introduction

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) both target segments of the energy-transition and critical-materials ecosystem, yet they pursue distinct strategies. NLR concentrates on companies involved in uranium production and nuclear power generation, offering investors a focused play on nuclear infrastructure. SETM, by contrast, spans a wider array of critical materials required for electrification and decarbonization. These ETFs do not compete directly but serve as complementary or alternative vehicles for investors seeking exposure to materials and technologies supporting long-term shifts in global energy supply and demand.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) seeks to replicate the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. The fund holds approximately 28 securities, primarily companies deriving significant revenue from uranium mining, nuclear reactor construction, and electricity generation from nuclear sources. Top holdings typically include major nuclear utilities and equipment providers with a geographic emphasis on the United States and Japan. Sector allocation is dominated by utilities, with limited exposure to pure energy or materials names. NLR operates as a passively managed, non-diversified ETF with an expense ratio of 0.52%. The index applies revenue-based eligibility criteria and rebalances periodically to maintain alignment with the nuclear theme.

Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) Overview

Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index and holds roughly 157 securities. The fund provides exposure to companies involved in mining, exploration, and processing of uranium, copper, rare earths, lithium, nickel, cobalt, graphite, manganese, and silver. Holdings are selected based on revenue thresholds tied to energy-transition materials. SETM is passively managed with quarterly index rebalancing and carries an expense ratio of 0.65%. Its broader mandate results in a multi-commodity profile that spans upstream producers across several critical-minerals categories, offering greater diversification than single-commodity peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the expanding critical-materials and clean-energy transition theme. Rising global electricity demand, driven by data centers, electric vehicles, and industrial electrification, has increased focus on reliable low-carbon power sources and the minerals required to build supporting infrastructure. Policy support for nuclear energy in several jurisdictions, alongside supply-chain security concerns for battery and rare-earth metals, creates structural tailwinds. Key risks include commodity price volatility, regulatory changes affecting mining permits, and potential delays in nuclear project development. Capital flows into thematic ETFs have reflected sustained investor interest in these long-term secular trends rather than short-term cyclical movements.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, NLR has exhibited sensitivity to nuclear-specific developments such as reactor restarts and uranium supply dynamics, resulting in distinct volatility patterns compared with broader equity markets. SETM’s multi-commodity approach has led to performance influenced by copper and lithium price movements in addition to uranium trends, producing a different risk-return profile. In periods of sector rotation toward energy infrastructure, NLR’s concentrated utilities exposure has provided relative stability, while SETM’s wider holdings have captured gains across multiple materials during commodity upswings. These differences highlight NLR’s role as a targeted nuclear allocation and SETM’s positioning as a diversified critical-materials basket.

AI Screener

AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorability to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) due to its lower expense ratio, more concentrated and thematically precise holdings, and established track record within the nuclear segment. Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) offers compelling diversification across critical materials but carries a higher cost and broader risk exposures that may dilute focus in a nuclear-centric environment. Final allocation decisions should reflect individual investor objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. SETM commentary
Oct 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a Hold and SETM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for NLR with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

NLR's Indicator enters downward trend

The Aroon Indicator for NLR entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 132 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 120 of the 132 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for NLR turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 42 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 35 of the 42 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 83%.

The 10-day moving average for NLR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 21, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NLR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 10 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +6.51% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NLR advanced for three days, in 300 of 337 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.

NLR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for SETM with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

SETM in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026

SETM moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 26 of 29 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The 10-day moving average for SETM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SETM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.

The Aroon Indicator for SETM entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 8 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 20 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +0.40% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SETM advanced for three days, in 214 of 234 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

SETM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRSETM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SETM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LQ23.92N/A
N/A
Simplify Tax Aware Alternatives ETF (LQ)
EVSD50.16-0.01
-0.01%
Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD)
GTOC24.17-0.04
-0.17%
Invesco Core Fixed Income ETF (GTOC)
ERH10.59-0.05
-0.42%
Allspring Utilities and High Income Fund
MART43.04-0.38
-0.87%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Mar ETF (MART)

NLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with OKLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then OKLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLR
1D Price
Change %
NLR100%
-0.51%
OKLO - NLR
83%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
SMR - NLR
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
BWXT - NLR
68%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
DUK - NLR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
XE - NLR
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
More

SETM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SETM has been closely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SETM jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SETM
1D Price
Change %
SETM100%
-0.77%
LAC - SETM
76%
Closely correlated
-1.43%
NB - SETM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
LAR - SETM
69%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
ATLX - SETM
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
ABAT - SETM
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.88%
More