NLR
Price
$119.95
Change
+$0.76 (+0.64%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
4.18B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SETM
Price
$33.96
Change
-$0.33 (-0.96%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
619.45M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs SETM

NLR vs SETM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) offers concentrated exposure to the nuclear energy value chain, including uranium mining and power generation, with approximately 29 holdings and a net expense ratio of 0.52%.
  • Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) provides broader access to critical materials essential for the energy transition, spanning uranium, copper, lithium, rare earths, and silver, with over 100 holdings and a net expense ratio of 0.65%.
  • Both ETFs pursue passive strategies tracking specialized indices focused on materials and energy themes, but NLR emphasizes nuclear utilities and miners while SETM diversifies across multiple energy-transition commodities.
  • NLR features a higher concentration in utilities and established nuclear operators, resulting in a narrower risk profile tied to nuclear power demand, whereas SETM spreads exposure across mining equities with greater sensitivity to commodity price cycles.
  • Structural differences in holdings count, sector weighting, and cost structure position the funds as complementary rather than direct competitors within the broader critical-materials and clean-energy investment landscape.
  • Liquidity profiles reflect NLR’s longer operating history since 2007 compared with SETM’s 2023 inception, influencing trading dynamics and institutional adoption patterns over recent market cycles.

Introduction

Investors seeking thematic exposure to nuclear power and the broader energy-transition supply chain frequently evaluate VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM). The two funds do not compete head-to-head; instead, they deliver differentiated strategies within overlapping sectors. NLR targets the full nuclear ecosystem, while SETM captures a wider basket of critical minerals required for electrification and decarbonization. Comparing their structures, holdings, costs, and positioning helps investors align portfolios with specific risk tolerances and thematic convictions amid rising electricity demand and supply-chain constraints.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index before fees and expenses. The fund maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 29 holdings, with top positions typically including Constellation Energy Corp (CEG), Cameco Corp (CCJ), Public Service Enterprise Group Inc (PEG), BWX Technologies Inc (BWXT), and Fortum Oyj. Sector allocations emphasize utilities and energy, reflecting companies involved in uranium mining, nuclear reactor construction, electricity generation, and related services. The strategy is fully passive and rules-based, requiring constituents to derive a substantial portion of revenue from nuclear-related activities. NLR carries a net expense ratio of 0.52% and has operated since 2007, offering established liquidity on NYSE Arca. Geographic exposure concentrates in the United States and Canada, with additional holdings in Australia, Europe, and Asia.

Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) Overview

Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Critical Materials Index, delivering exposure to companies deriving at least 50% of revenue or assets from mining, exploration, production, or recycling of energy-transition materials. The fund holds between 100 and 150 issuers, with top holdings often featuring Freeport-McMoRan Inc (FCX), National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC, Cameco Corp (CCJ), Lynas Rare Earths Ltd, and Pilbara Minerals Ltd. Material weightings span copper, uranium, lithium, silver, and rare earths equities. The passive, market-cap-weighted approach rebalances semi-annually. SETM maintains a net expense ratio of 0.65% and launched in 2023 on Nasdaq. Its broader diversification across global mining equities results in higher exposure to emerging markets and commodity-price volatility compared with narrower nuclear-focused vehicles.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the accelerating energy-transition theme driven by rising global electricity demand, data-center expansion, and policy support for low-carbon generation. Nuclear power benefits from renewed interest as a reliable baseload source, while critical materials face supply constraints amid surging requirements for batteries, renewables, and grid infrastructure. Regulatory developments, including permitting reforms and export controls on strategic minerals, influence capital flows. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate trajectories and industrial metal price cycles affect mining margins. Sector risks include commodity-price swings, geopolitical tensions in key producing regions, and execution challenges in mine development. These dynamics create distinct opportunity sets: nuclear operators enjoy long-term contracts and regulatory tailwinds, whereas upstream miners experience higher cyclicality tied to spot prices.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, NLR has exhibited volatility linked to nuclear sentiment and uranium spot prices, with performance influenced by earnings from major utilities and miner contract renewals. SETM has shown greater sensitivity to broader commodity trends, particularly copper and lithium price movements, resulting in potentially wider drawdowns during risk-off periods. In recent weeks and months, relative positioning has reflected sector rotation toward electrification themes, with both funds benefiting from policy momentum yet diverging based on commodity-specific drivers. NLR’s heavier utilities weighting tends to provide modest income and lower beta to pure mining equities, while SETM’s diversified materials basket offers higher growth potential accompanied by elevated volatility. Investors assess these characteristics against portfolio objectives rather than isolated short-term returns.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs may find the platform a useful complement to traditional research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The fund’s lower expense ratio, narrower yet focused holdings profile, and longer operating history contribute to greater cost efficiency and established liquidity. Its concentrated nuclear exposure aligns with sustained sector momentum from electricity-demand growth, while the utilities component may moderate volatility relative to broader mining baskets. SETM offers compelling diversification across critical materials; however, its higher cost and wider commodity sensitivity introduce additional risk factors in the current environment. Allocations ultimately depend on individual investor objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. SETM commentary
Sep 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a StrongBuy and SETM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 4.18B vs. SETM (619M). SETM has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: SETM (17.306) vs NLR (-3.422). NLR was incepted earlier than SETM: NLR (19 years) vs SETM (4 years). NLR (0.52) has a lower expense ratio than SETM (0.65). SETM has a higher turnover NLR (42.00) vs NLR (42.00).
NLRSETMNLR / SETM
Gain YTD-3.42217.306-20%
Net Assets4.18B619M676%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.6580%
Turnover42.0055.0076%
Yield2.671.31204%
Fund Existence19 years4 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRSETM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SETM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMVYX33.520.22
+0.66%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value I
SGGIX95.790.09
+0.09%
DWS Large Cap Focus Growth Inst
GCMAX40.120.03
+0.07%
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value A
MINFX43.66-0.20
-0.46%
MFS International Intrinsic Equity R2
FRVDX41.50-0.90
-2.12%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate M

NLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with SMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then SMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLR
1D Price
Change %
NLR100%
+0.64%
SMR - NLR
80%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
BWXT - NLR
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
DUK - NLR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
ETR - NLR
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
EXC - NLR
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
More