NLR
Price
$89.93
Change
+$0.28 (+0.31%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.22B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URNM
Price
$41.41
Change
-$0.14 (-0.34%)
Updated
Nov 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.85B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs URNM

NLR vs URNM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) offers broader exposure across the nuclear energy value chain, including utilities, reactor construction, and equipment providers, while Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) provides concentrated, pure-play access to uranium mining companies.
  • NLR tracks the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index with approximately 28 holdings and a net expense ratio of 0.52 percent; URNM tracks the VettaFi Global Uranium Mining Index with around 26 holdings and a higher expense ratio of 0.75 percent.
  • Both ETFs pursue passive, thematic strategies focused on the nuclear and uranium sector but differ in diversification: NLR spreads risk across multiple nuclear-related subsectors, whereas URNM exhibits higher concentration in miners.
  • Structural features position NLR as a more diversified vehicle within the broader nuclear theme, while URNM targets higher-beta exposure to uranium price movements and mining operations.
  • Expense ratio and holdings concentration represent primary differentiators for long-term cost efficiency and risk management between the two funds.
  • Investors seeking balanced nuclear energy participation may favor NLR, while those targeting upstream uranium supply dynamics may consider URNM for its specialized focus.

Introduction

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) both provide targeted exposure to the nuclear energy and uranium sectors, yet they address distinct segments of the value chain. These ETFs do not compete directly as interchangeable products; instead, they serve as complementary or alternative tools for investors pursuing thematic exposure to nuclear power generation and uranium supply. In the current environment of rising interest in low-carbon energy sources and energy security, comparing their structural characteristics helps clarify suitable positioning within a diversified portfolio.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) seeks to replicate the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. The fund holds approximately 28 securities and maintains a passive investment approach. Top holdings typically include companies involved in uranium mining, nuclear utilities, and reactor technology. Sector allocations emphasize nuclear energy infrastructure and related services. The net expense ratio stands at 0.52 percent. As a non-diversified, thematic ETF, NLR rebalances in line with its underlying index methodology, which caps individual security weights and reviews constituents quarterly. The structure supports broad participation across the nuclear ecosystem while maintaining liquidity on NYSE Arca.

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Overview

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) seeks to track the VettaFi Global Uranium Mining Index. The fund holds approximately 26 securities with a focus on companies deriving at least 50 percent of assets from uranium mining, exploration, or related activities, including physical uranium holdings. This results in a concentrated portfolio centered on upstream producers. The expense ratio is 0.75 percent. URNM employs a passive strategy with semi-annual or quarterly index rebalancing. The ETF structure delivers pure-play exposure to uranium miners and is listed on NYSE Arca, offering investors direct access to the mining segment of the uranium supply chain.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The nuclear energy sector benefits from global efforts to decarbonize power generation and enhance energy security. Key macro drivers include policy support for nuclear capacity expansion, supply constraints in uranium markets, and shifting capital flows toward reliable baseload power sources. Regulatory developments around permitting and fuel supply chains influence project timelines, while commodity price trends for uranium affect miner profitability. Both ETFs operate within this thematic environment, where long-term demand growth intersects with cyclical supply dynamics and geopolitical considerations affecting resource availability.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has exhibited more moderate volatility due to its inclusion of stable utilities and infrastructure companies alongside miners. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM), with its mining-centric holdings, has shown greater sensitivity to uranium price fluctuations and sector rotation patterns. Relative positioning reflects differing responses to interest rate expectations, earnings from top holdings, and broader commodity trends. Over recent weeks and months, these characteristics have produced distinct risk-return profiles, with NLR offering smoother exposure and URNM delivering amplified participation in uranium-specific momentum.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) due to its lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the nuclear value chain, and more balanced risk profile relative to the concentrated mining focus of Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM). This assessment rests on cost efficiency, holdings dispersion, and thematic consistency rather than short-term price action.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. URNM commentary
Nov 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a Hold and URNM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for NLR with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

Momentum Indicator for NLR turns negative, indicating new downward trend

NLR saw its Momentum Indicator move below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new downward move. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 88 similar instances where the indicator turned negative. In 79 of the 88 cases, the stock moved further down in the following days. The odds of a decline are at 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 52 of 65 cases where NLR's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where NLR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

The Aroon Indicator for NLR entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where NLR's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 27 of 28 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for NLR just turned positive on October 28, 2026. Looking at past instances where NLR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.

Following a +5.41% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where NLR advanced for three days, in 299 of 336 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.

NLR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for URNM with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

URNM in -7.21% downward trend, falling for three consecutive days on November 02, 2026

Moving lower for three straight days is viewed as a bearish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future declines. Considering data from situations where URNM declined for three days, in 272 of 301 cases, the price declined further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 58 of 65 cases where URNM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 30, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on URNM as a result. In 74 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for URNM entered a downward trend on October 28, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where URNM's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 22 of 22 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for URNM just turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where URNM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.

Following a +7.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where URNM advanced for three days, in 302 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

URNM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRURNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with OKLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then OKLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLR
1D Price
Change %
NLR100%
+0.44%
OKLO - NLR
85%
Closely correlated
-0.13%
SMR - NLR
81%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
BWXT - NLR
68%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
DUK - NLR
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
XE - NLR
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
More

URNM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that URNM and API have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that URNM and API's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To URNM
1D Price
Change %
URNM100%
-0.55%
API - URNM
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
MGA - URNM
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.89%
LOT - URNM
14%
Poorly correlated
-26.68%
PEN - URNM
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
CVV - URNM
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERC8.560.05
+0.59%
Allspring Multi-Sector Income Fund
BUFC43.250.04
+0.09%
AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC)
AQLG25.15N/A
N/A
HCM Large Cap Growth ETF
WEBX16.91N/A
N/A
Corgi Chinese Internet 2x Daily ETF (WEBX)
HCOW25.60-0.13
-0.49%
Amplify COWS Covered Call ETF (HCOW)