NLR
Price
$119.19
Change
+$2.16 (+1.85%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
4.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
URNM
Price
$57.20
Change
+$2.24 (+4.08%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.12B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLR vs URNM

NLR vs URNM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) vs. Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM)

Key Takeaways

  • NLR provides broader exposure across the nuclear value chain, including utilities and power generation, while URNM concentrates on uranium mining and exploration companies.
  • NLR tracks the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index with approximately 29 holdings and a net expense ratio of 0.52%, offering a lower-cost structure than URNM’s 0.75% expense ratio.
  • URNM follows the VettaFi Global Uranium Mining Index with a focus on pure-play miners and physical uranium holdings, resulting in higher concentration risk and greater sensitivity to uranium commodity prices.
  • Both ETFs target the uranium and nuclear energy theme but differ in risk profiles: NLR emphasizes operational utilities with steadier cash flows, whereas URNM tilts toward volatile mining equities.
  • Structural differences in sector allocation position NLR for balanced participation in nuclear power demand and URNM for leveraged exposure to uranium supply dynamics.
  • Relative positioning favors NLR for investors seeking diversified thematic exposure within the sector at a lower ongoing cost.

Introduction

The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) and the Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) both offer targeted access to the uranium and nuclear energy sector, yet they pursue distinct strategies within the same thematic space. These ETFs do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they provide complementary exposure options for investors seeking participation in rising global demand for clean baseload power and uranium supply. NLR delivers a broader view of the nuclear ecosystem, while URNM narrows focus to mining operations, allowing investors to align allocations with specific risk tolerances and market views on commodity prices versus power generation stability.

VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) Overview

The VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) is a passive, rules-based fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index before fees and expenses. The index selects companies deriving at least 50% of revenue from uranium mining, nuclear power facility construction, electricity generation from nuclear sources, or related equipment and services. As of recent data, NLR holds approximately 29 securities with a net expense ratio of 0.52%. Top holdings typically include Constellation Energy Corporation (CEG), Cameco Corp (CCJ), Public Service Enterprise Group Inc (PEG), BWX Technologies Inc (BWXT), and Fortum Oyj, reflecting a mix of utilities and energy firms. Sector allocations emphasize utilities and energy, with geographic exposure concentrated in the United States and Canada. The fund employs full replication methodology and rebalances periodically to maintain index alignment, distinguishing it through broader nuclear value-chain coverage beyond pure mining.

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Overview

The Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) is a passive fund designed to track the VettaFi Global Uranium Mining Index. The index targets companies allocating at least 50% of assets to uranium mining, exploration, development, production, or supporting activities including physical uranium holdings and royalties. URNM maintains roughly 25 to 30 holdings with a net expense ratio of 0.75%. Prominent positions often feature Cameco Corp (CCJ), NexGen Energy Ltd (NXE), Sprott Physical Uranium Trust, Uranium Energy Corp (UEC), and Denison Mines Corp (DNN), resulting in heavy emphasis on mining equities and physical uranium exposure. The fund allocates predominantly to the energy sector with significant Canadian and Australian representation. Quarterly rebalancing supports index fidelity, while the structure delivers concentrated, high-beta exposure to uranium price movements compared with broader nuclear plays.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The uranium and nuclear energy sector benefits from structural tailwinds including global decarbonization efforts, energy security priorities, and increasing recognition of nuclear power as a reliable, low-carbon baseload source. Capital flows into the sector have accelerated amid policy support in major economies and supply constraints from long development timelines for new mines. Regulatory developments around permitting and international uranium trade continue to influence project economics, while macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories affect financing costs for capital-intensive nuclear projects. Key risks encompass commodity price volatility, geopolitical tensions affecting supply from key producers, and execution challenges in bringing new capacity online. These dynamics create differentiated opportunities for mining-focused versus integrated nuclear exposure strategies.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, NLR has exhibited relatively moderated volatility due to its inclusion of regulated utilities with predictable cash flows, providing ballast during periods of uranium price swings. URNM, by contrast, has shown higher sensitivity to uranium spot prices and mining sector rotations, amplifying both upside participation and drawdowns in response to commodity trends and exploration news flow. During recent weeks and months, sector momentum tied to earnings from major producers and shifts in interest rate expectations have influenced relative returns, with NLR demonstrating steadier positioning across broader nuclear demand drivers and URNM capturing sharper moves in pure mining equities. These patterns underscore NLR’s role in diversified thematic allocations versus URNM’s utility for tactical commodity exposure.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into thematic ETFs like NLR and URNM may find the platform useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to NLR. The ETF’s lower expense ratio, broader diversification across the nuclear value chain, and inclusion of utilities provide a more balanced risk profile and cost efficiency compared with URNM’s higher fees and concentrated mining focus. These characteristics support greater consistency in thematic exposure amid evolving sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NLR vs. URNM commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a StrongBuy and URNM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 4.09B vs. URNM (2.12B). URNM has a higher annual dividend yield than NLR: URNM (4.208) vs NLR (-4.034). NLR was incepted earlier than URNM: NLR (19 years) vs URNM (7 years). NLR (0.52) has a lower expense ratio than URNM (0.75). NLR has a higher turnover URNM (35.00) vs URNM (35.00).
NLRURNMNLR / URNM
Gain YTD-4.0344.208-96%
Net Assets4.09B2.12B193%
Total Expense Ratio0.520.7569%
Turnover42.0035.00120%
Yield2.673.0687%
Fund Existence19 years7 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLRURNM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
URNM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HGRO30.410.38
+1.26%
Hedgeye Quality Growth ETF
BSCV16.170.03
+0.19%
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF
KEMQ25.57-0.04
-0.15%
KraneShares Public-Priv EMIntrnt&TechETF
MFSM24.41-0.04
-0.18%
MFS Active Intermediate Muni Bond ETF
ATMP36.79-0.23
-0.62%
Barclays ETN+ Select MLP