Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.60
Change+$0.09 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.55B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.71
Change+$0.16 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.13M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.55B vs. RLSFX (36.1M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.29 vs. NLSCX (9.85). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.05 vs. RLSFX (-7.44).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.635 | 4.226 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.55B | 36.1M | 20,903% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.85 | 18.29 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.46 | 47.27 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.05 | -7.44 | -283% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.97 | 34.74 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers