Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.15
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.38B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.23
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.9M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.38B vs. RLSFX (35.9M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.44 vs. RLSFX (6.07). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.01 vs. RLSFX (-4.39).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.713 | 1.433 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.38B | 35.9M | 20,552% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.44 | 6.07 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 48.90 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.01 | -4.39 | -524% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.00 | 32.94 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement