Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$13.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.17B vs. RLSFX (40.1M). NLSCX pays higher dividends than RLSFX: NLSCX (0.03) vs RLSFX (0.00). NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (13 years) vs RLSFX (12 years). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.81 vs. NLSCX (8.18). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.49 vs. RLSFX (5.62).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.567 | 10.954 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.17B | 40.1M | 17,890% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 28.81 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.00 | -33.15 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.49 | 5.62 | 347% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.67 | 30.45 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers