Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.69
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.81B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.21
Change-$0.10 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.86M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.81B vs. RLSFX (36.9M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.46 vs. NLSCX (7.84). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 17.53 vs. RLSFX (-7.83).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.766 | 9.670 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.81B | 36.9M | 21,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 15.46 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.71 | 79.27 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.53 | -7.83 | -224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.59 | 52.89 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement