Ad is loading...
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$17.44
Change-$0.23 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.25B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$12.65
Change-$0.64 (-4.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.92M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.25B vs. RLSFX (34.9M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (13 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (17.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. RLSFX (3.99). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.76 vs. RLSFX (5.64).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.113 | -4.799 | 2% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.25B | 34.9M | 20,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 3.99 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.37 | -6.41 | -84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.76 | 5.64 | 545% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.14 | 27.71 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers