Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.69
Change-$0.09 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.86
Change-$0.11 (-0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.43M
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 8.01B vs. RLSFX (35.4M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.17). NLSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX (7.54) and NLSCX (7.31) have marching annual gain over last year. NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.86 vs. RLSFX (-10.04).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.00 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.43 | 2.17 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.162 | 7.235 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.01B | 35.4M | 22,616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.31 | 7.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.97 | 71.28 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.86 | -10.04 | -158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.60 | 41.72 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement