Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSCX vs RLSFX
NLSCX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSCX vs. RLSFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSCX is a Hold and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.63B vs. RLSFX (25.9M). NLSCX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSCX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSCX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). NLSCX (2.38) is less costly to investors than RLSFX (2.19). RLSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NLSCX (0.96). NLSCX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.84 vs. NLSCX (4.43). NLSCX return over 5 years is better than : 12.08 vs. RLSFX (-25.52).
| NLSCX | RLSFX | NLSCX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 2.00 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.38 | 2.19 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.533 | -3.038 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.63B | 25.9M | 29,448% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.43 | 5.84 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.59 | 39.02 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.08 | -25.52 | -47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.98 | 55.59 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement