Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs TRQZX
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs TRQZX
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. TRQZX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. NMANX (2.09B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMANX: TRQZX (0.71) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMANX (48 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMANX (0.83) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: TRQZX (0) vs NMANX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.76 vs. NMANX (-26.29). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -22.12 vs. NMANX (-35.65).
| NMANX | TRQZX | NMANX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.61 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 48 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.750 | 0.488 | -154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 21.1B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -26.29 | -5.76 | 457% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.83 | 0.92 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.65 | -22.12 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers