Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMANX vs TRQZX
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NMANX vs TRQZX
NMANX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMANX vs. TRQZX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMANX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 22.6B vs. NMANX (2.29B). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NMANX: TRQZX (0.71) vs NMANX (0.00). NMANX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NMANX (47 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NMANX (0.83) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). NMANX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. TRQZX (31.50). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMANX: TRQZX (0) vs NMANX (1000). TRQZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.41 vs. NMANX (-16.05). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -15.50 vs. NMANX (-28.12).
| NMANX | TRQZX | NMANX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.61 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 47 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.344 | 4.201 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 22.6B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -16.05 | 0.41 | -3,883% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.59 | 1.72 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.12 | -15.50 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.93 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers