Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMBAX vs RTECX
NMBAX vs RTECX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs RTECX
NMBAX vs RTECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. RTECX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and RTECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.3B vs. RTECX (7.17B). NMBAX pays higher dividends than RTECX: NMBAX (3.27) vs RTECX (2.57). NMBAX was incepted earlier than RTECX: NMBAX (31 years) vs RTECX (27 years). RTECX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.63). RTECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. NMBAX (24.00). RTECX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: RTECX (0) vs NMBAX (2500). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.47 vs. RTECX (-0.80). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.02 vs. RTECX (-3.98).
| NMBAX | RTECX | NMBAX / RTECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.51 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 1.57 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.985 | -1.783 | 111% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.3B | 7.17B | 130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.27 | 2.57 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | -0.80 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.73 | 6.08 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.02 | -3.98 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.71 | -1.72 | -797% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement