Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMBAX vs RTECX
NMBAX vs RTECX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs RTECX
NMBAX vs RTECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. RTECX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and RTECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.5B vs. RTECX (6.64B). NMBAX pays higher dividends than RTECX: NMBAX (3.21) vs RTECX (2.57). NMBAX was incepted earlier than RTECX: NMBAX (31 years) vs RTECX (27 years). RTECX (1.57) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.64). RTECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. NMBAX (27.00). RTECX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: RTECX (0) vs NMBAX (2500). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.02 vs. RTECX (5.14). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.81 vs. RTECX (-1.28).
| NMBAX | RTECX | NMBAX / RTECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.51 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.57 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.123 | 1.104 | 102% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.5B | 6.64B | 143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.21 | 2.57 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 5.14 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.74 | 8.66 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.81 | -1.28 | -376% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.44 | 1.38 | 1,260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement