Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMBAX vs TAMUX
NMBAX vs TAMUX Comparison
Open Charts NMBAX vs TAMUX
NMBAX vs TAMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMBAX vs. TAMUX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMBAX is a Hold and TAMUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMBAX has more cash in the bank: 9.6B vs. TAMUX (938M). NMBAX (3.20) and TAMUX (3.14) have matching dividends . NMBAX was incepted earlier than TAMUX: NMBAX (31 years) vs TAMUX (14 years). TAMUX (0.79) is less costly to investors than NMBAX (0.64). TAMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 118.00 vs. NMBAX (27.00). TAMUX initial investment is less costly to investors than NMBAX (3%) vs NMBAX (3%). TAMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: TAMUX (1000) vs NMBAX (2500). TAMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.80 vs. NMBAX (5.29). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.82 vs. TAMUX (1.46).
| NMBAX | TAMUX | NMBAX / TAMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.69 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.79 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.499 | 2.236 | 67% |
| Front Load | 3% | 3% | 92% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.6B | 938M | 1,024% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 3.14 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 6.80 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.40 | 11.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.82 | 1.46 | 331% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.64 | 15.17 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers