Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NMCAX vs PAMCX
NMCAX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts NMCAX vs PAMCX
NMCAX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NMCAX vs. PAMCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NMCAX is a Buy and PAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. NMCAX (590M). NMCAX (0.00) and PAMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . NMCAX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: NMCAX (28 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). NMCAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.02). NMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 87.00 vs. PAMCX (31.50). NMCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: NMCAX (1000) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.95 vs. NMCAX (-9.71). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -18.38 vs. NMCAX (-27.68).
| NMCAX | PAMCX | NMCAX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.02 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 1.02 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.540 | 2.296 | 328% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 23.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.71 | 1.95 | -498% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.95 | 2.08 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.68 | -18.38 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.30 | 26.84 | -83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement